Operational Resilience Software for Chief Risk Officers
Fusion connects validated dependency data, impact tolerances, and scenario testing in one model. Chief Risk Officers can quantify exposure, Chief Resilience Officers can demonstrate capability, and operational resilience teams can identify and close gaps faster.
4.4/5 Star Rating on G2
Leader in BCM
BCI World Hall of Fame
4.5/5 Star Rating on Capterra
Three Risk Management Roles, Three Different Decisions
Risk and resilience leaders rely on the same operational evidence to make different decisions. Fusion connects all three roles through one continuously curated service-and-dependency model, giving executives evidence for boards and examiners while helping operational teams maintain the data, testing, and remediation behind it.
Chief Risk Officer
Fusion helps Chief Risk Officers quantify operational resilience gaps in risk profile terms, including potential capital charges, regulatory findings, ratings impact, and board reporting.
Chief Resilience Officer
Fusion helps Chief Resilience Officers demonstrate cross-functional resilience capability, align executive stakeholders, and show continued improvement with evidence grounded in validated data.
Head of Operational Resilience
Fusion helps Heads of Operational Resilience maintain impact tolerances, scenario coverage, and third-party dependency data across the enterprise or a specific business line. Identify capability gaps and prioritize remediation.
Four Questions Risk and Resilience Leaders Need to Answer
Boards and regulators need evidence that resilience plans hold up under severe but plausible scenarios. Risk and resilience leaders need current answers to four questions:
- What is impacted? Which critical services, risk categories, and resilience capabilities are exposed?
- What happens next? How could the disruption cascade, and which impact tolerances could be breached?
- What is the financial exposure? What could the exposure mean for capital charges, regulatory penalties, ratings, or other financial consequences?
- What should we prioritize? Which gaps require evidence or remediation first for the board, regulators, and operational teams?
Fusion keeps these answers connected to validated data so leaders can act at decision speed.
Connect Risk and Resilience Data
Bring GRC, risk reporting, continuity, IT, third-party, and operational data into one continuously updated service-and-dependency model. Link operational dependencies to risk exposure, impact tolerances, and resilience capability.
Fusion’s Approach to Risk and Resilience Management
Fusion helps teams identify resilience gaps, model their effects, and prioritize remediation using one shared, governed model.
Expose
Connect critical services, dependencies, impact tolerances, risks, and controls to identify where resilience capability is weakest.
Model
Run severe but plausible scenarios against validated dependency data to see how exposure could cascade.
Optimize
Prioritize remediation and evidence based on impact tolerances, financial exposure, and stakeholder requirements.
Case Study
If we were being honest about our situation, we had documented what we believed recovery looked like. What we did not have was any way to validate whether that documentation matched how recovery would actually execute when it needed to.
Senior Director of Global Resilience, Japan-Based Global Investment Bank
Build Evidence That Holds Up
Keep resilience claims traceable to validated data, testing results, and impact tolerances. Give boards and examiners current evidence without rebuilding it ahead of every review.
Learn More
Run Scenario Testing Continuously
Simulate severe but plausible disruptions against your dependency model as the business changes. See where impact tolerances and scenario coverage need attention before the next review or disruption.
Scenario Testing
Give Every Stakeholder the Right View
Present the same governed evidence in the context each stakeholder needs. Risk leaders can report in risk profile terms, resilience leaders can coordinate across functions, and operational teams can manage the underlying data and actions.
Explore the Platform
FAQs
The Chief Risk Officer owns risk exposure, board reporting, and budget decisions.
The Chief Resilience Officer coordinates the enterprise mandate and demonstrates capability across functions.
The Head of Operational Resilience maintains impact tolerances, scenario testing, and dependency data.
Fusion supports all three through one service-and-dependency model, with reporting and engagement paths suited to each role.
Yes. Operational resilience teams often manage impact tolerances, scenario testing, and third-party dependency mapping under the CRO, COO, or another risk function. Fusion supports the team maintaining the program and the executives using its evidence. Program leaders can start with the Find Your Resilience Gaps assessment.
Fusion supports combined and separate governance models. Quantified risk exposure, cross-functional capability evidence, and the dependency model that produces both remain connected in one platform.
Regulatory evidence connects critical services, impact tolerances, severe but plausible scenarios, test results, and current dependency data. It should show whether the organization can remain within tolerance and where remediation is required.
Fusion runs scenarios against a validated, continuously updated dependency model. As services, third parties, technology, and facilities change, teams can identify new gaps in scenario coverage and impact tolerance performance.
Yes. Fusion integrates with GRC platforms and existing risk reporting tools. GRC platforms are essential systems of record. Fusion is the decision layer above them, purpose-built to answer the four questions that systems of record were never designed to answer: what is impacted, what happens next, what is the financial exposure, and what should we prioritize?
Connect Resilience Gaps to Enterprise Exposure
Get an executive-ready view of financial and operational exposure, critical dependencies, and priorities. Program leaders can also assess current capability and identify the gaps to address next.